11592.0 kHz - Unid FSK 41.6 Bd/200 Hz shift (CIS/Rus FSK family?)

i56578-swl.blogspot.com 1 dzień temu

An unidentified FSK 41.6 Bd/200 Hz signal on 11592.0 kHz (CF), reminiscent of — but not rather matching — the Russian Navy's well-known T-600/CIS-36-50 family. inactive an open case after days of monitoring and a first TDoA attempt.

1. Signal Parameters
Among the FSK utility signals monitored on HF, a transmission on 11592.0 kHz (cf) stands out for its distinctive parameters: about 41.6–41.67 Bd with a 200 Hz shift between mark and space tones (Figure 1). The 200 Hz shift value is reminiscent of T-600, a proprietary FSK broadcast strategy utilized by the Russian Navy (also known as BEE-36 or CIS 36-50), which is documented to usage a 200 Hz shift at more than 1 baud rate [1]. Neither of these documented rates matches the ~41.6–41.67 Bd observed here, nor does any another published T-600 configuration. At most, then, the shift value can be treated as a household resemblance to the T-600 strategy alternatively than a affirmative identification.

Figure 1: Top: waterfall/spectrogram of the two-tone FSK carrier. Bottom: period/pattern analysis confirming a symbol rate of 41.66 Bd (Br) and a measured shift dF = 201.42 Hz

A further characteristic emerges erstwhile examining the phase relation across successive shifts: the phase of each speech is not preserved from 1 occurrence to the next, and this holds independently for both the space speech (Figure 2) and the mark speech (Figure 3). This is consistent with the 2 tones being generated by 2 independent, free-running oscillators alternatively than a single voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) switching frequency while preserving phase continuity — a strategy under which no phase discontinuity would be expected at the shifts.
Figure 2: Persistence display of the space speech across successive shifts. The Δθ arrows mark the phase offset between successive shifts, showing that phase is not preserved.
Figure 3: Persistence display of the mark speech across successive shifts, showing the same deficiency of phase continuity.
A straightforward computation from the persistence displays confirms these speech frequencies. Measuring the elapsed time across 2 cycles gives 0.002220733 s for the space speech and 0.001815733 s for the mark tone, corresponding to (respectively):
2 / 0.002220733 ≈ 900.60 Hz
2 / 0.001822133 ≈ 1097.61 Hz
The resulting shift (≈197 Hz) is consistent with the previously measured dF = 201.42 Hz (Figure 1), and the speech pair's midpoint (≈1001.0 Hz) matches the expected ~1000 Hz baseband position given the 1 kHz USB dial offset utilized for the recording.
2. Transmission Pattern
The frequency vicinity around 11592.0 kHz offers additional context for the transmission pattern described below: a fresh capture (Figure 4) shows the station idling while 2 confirmed Russian BEE/50 circuits close actively carry crypto traffic — at 11598 kHz (200 Hz shift) and 11603 kHz (250 Hz shift), the same shift variability already noted for the T-600/CIS 36-50 household in Section 1. Unlike its neighbours at the time of capture, 11592.0 kHz was idling, consistent with the traffic pattern discussed in this section.

Figure 4 – Frequency vicinity snapshot: 11592.0 kHz idling alongside 2 confirmed Russian BEE/50 circuits actively carrying crypto traffic, at 11598 kHz (200 Hz shift) and 11603 kHz (250 Hz shift).

The bulk of the observed traffic consists of idling — the regular "01"s sequences besides known as eversals. Transmissions begin around 0800 UTC, with no preceding call-up or announcement (Figure 5, top), and proceed for about 10 hours, until about 1800 UTC, ending as abruptly as they begin, with no sign-off (Figure 6). The on- and off-times are not perfectly fixed: variations of more than a minute have been observed on repeated occasions, which is consistent with — though does not confirm — manual start/stop of the transmission alternatively than a strictly clock-driven schedule. The idling phase is occasionally interrupted by brief N0N(1) transmissions on the space-tone frequency, before resuming the average alternating pattern (Figure 5, bottom).

Figure 5: Top: onset of transmission with no preamble. Bottom: idling briefly interrupted by an N0N transmission on the "space" requency.


Figure 6: End of transmission: the reversals pattern cuts off abruptly into noise, with no sign-off (recording started 17 September 2026, 17:35:34 UTC; the .wav file was later trimmed to isolate the transmission's closing segment).

Very short N0N interruptions were besides recorded during any monitoring sessions (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Reversals series briefly interrupted by N0N transmissions on the space frequency.

Nighttime monitoring (beyond the 1800–0800 UTC window) has so far only been carried out on a fewer occasions but without receptions of the signal of interest. Given that this null consequence is consistent with the daytime-only agenda already established above, it does not by itself indicate a separate nighttime frequency. 1 plausible explanation, common to HF fixed/military links, is that 11592.0 kHz (cf) could service as the daytime channel with a distinct, as-yet-unidentified frequency utilized at night(2). No candidate night frequency carrying the same modem signature has been found so far, so this remains an open hypothesis for future monitoring alternatively than an established fact.

3. Attribution Assessment
Geolocation. 4 independent TDoA runs were carried out utilizing a European KiwiSDR receiver network (nodes in/near Germany, Poland, the Slovakia/Hungary border, Croatia, Italy, and Greece), with no receiver coverage east of the target. Given this geometry, all baselines approach the emitter from broadly the same direction, producing hyperbolic lines of position that intersect at shallow angles — which limits precision along that bearing.
Results. The 4 fixes (44.40N/32.60E, 44.80N/30.80E, 43.60N/30.40E, 45.00N/32.20E) cluster within about 150–230 km of each another (Figure 8), in the northwestern Black Sea / confederate Ukraine coast / Crimea-approaches area that overlaps the operating theatre of Russia's Black Sea Fleet (home-ported at Sevastopol, Crimea), which is consistent with — though does not confirm — the CIS-36-50/Russian Navy household hypothesis raised above, possibly as a shore-to-ship link. Resolving the emitter's location further would require at least 1 receiver east of the mark to break the current fan geometry; until then, this consequence stands as a corroborating but non-conclusive data point.

Figure 8 – 4 independent TDoA fixes for the 11592.0 kHz signal, clustering in the northwestern Black Sea / Crimea-approaches area.

Hardware attribution. Beyond geolocation, no hardware or cryptographic device designation can presently be attributed to this signal — and indeed, no meaningful message about its encryption can be made at all, since no actual data traffic has yet been captured: everything observed so far consists of idling and N0N segments, neither of which carries any cryptographic content to analyze. any sources associate similarly-parametered Russian military/government FSK modes with circumstantial T-series cipher devices or R-series radio terminals, but no of these attributions match the 41.6–41.67 Bd / 200 Hz combination observed here, and no corroborating origin has been found for a name or nickname circumstantial to this signal. Pending further monitoring and input from another analysts, the transmission is best treated as unidentified, tentatively consistent with a CIS/Russian military or government FSK family.

4. Preliminary Conclusions
Why the idling? Continuous idling of this kind can be attributed to respective different operational, technical, or strategical rationales. It may service to keep the frequency occupied, preventing another stations or commercial broadcasters from utilizing the same channel. It besides allows automatic receivers — presumably off-shore ones — to stay synchronized with the carrier's clock, ready to lock onto the traffic the instant real transmission begins. In the author's experience, however, this frequency has frequently been monitored for extended periods without any traffic being heard beyond the idling tone, though this alone is not adequate to characterize the intent of the station.
Alternative explanations. another explanations for the extended idling stay equally speculative. 1 possibility, consistent with the TDoA-supported shore-to-ship hypothesis (Section 3), is that this behaves as a fleet broadcast, where actual data traffic is typically brief and occurs only erstwhile there is simply a genuine dispatch to send. It could besides service as a continuous propagation test on this circumstantial frequency, or represent a reserve channel — loosely termed here a "ghost net" — kept active by a secondary control station while the main operational network routes traffic elsewhere, for example over primary frequencies offering better propagation at a given time.
The frequency neighborhood. The frequency image in Figure 4 besides raises questions that stay speculative, grounded only in the signals' own characteristics alternatively than in any further evidence: why would FSK broadcasts sitting so close together in frequency usage different shift configurations, and could this reflect different intended recipients tuned to different channels, possibly with any form of channel prioritization? In the author's experience, a loose parallel exists with NATO FSK broadcasts [2], which commonly usage 50/75 Bd with an 850 Hz shift — though under different encryption (KW-46 or KG-84), making the comparison structural at best alternatively than substantive.

Only future — and hopefully more fortunate — captures that include an actual dispatch transmission are likely to supply more definitive answers. Friends who may have recordings of this signal, peculiarly from nighttime hours or capturing an actual burst of traffic, are warmly invited to get in contact at [email protected].

Downloads
Signal recordings: https://disk.yandex.com/d/_U2lItInFJNeEg

Notes
1.In shortwave radio monitoring and ITU emanation classification, N0N is an emanation designator that stands for a continuous, unmodulated carrier carrying no information.
2. For example, the HFGCS network uses 11175 kHz as its main daytime frequency and 4724 kHz at night.

References
[1] http://i56578-swl.blogspot.com/2016/10/cis-navy-50bd200-fsk-t600-bee-36-cis-36.html
[2] https://i56578-swl.blogspot.com/p/nato-4481f-brassmrl.html

Idź do oryginalnego materiału